dear livejournal genie
Nov. 9th, 2008 11:23 amDoes anyone know if in German philosophy there was ever a specific term for something like "being in history" or "history-in-progress"--either referring to subject positionality in history, or the process of history unfolding? I feel like maybe
never_the_less or maybe
nightspore would know?..
ETA: NOT Dasein.
ETA: NOT Dasein.
no subject
and since Dasein is historicizing being,
you might be meaning something like a subject that is history unfolding. I think. Not a catalyst, not an antagonistic resistor, but an agonist with history. You don't need Heidegger, you need Nietzsche, I think. Maybe his "On the Utility and Liability for History for Life". But maybe you don't need a German, maybe a subject that is an agonist with history is what Foucault was talking about when he got down to discussing disciplinarity in "The Subject and Power"? Maybe Elizabeth Grosz can help, and having said that maybe even Darwin can - in fact I'm sure Darwin can be inspirational if read with the right mindset (again EG can help). But I doubt you're looking for anything so (generally) creepy to cultural theory. Historically agonistic subjectivity might be excavated up from Saba Mahmood's book about suffering, or one of the Marxist-leaning Sci Studies people.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 12:50 pm (UTC)No AAAs for me. (Ever???)
I'm in Delhi, stuck on a rooftop in Monkeyland.
Which come to think of it, is a very good title.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 04:18 pm (UTC)But I don't know of specific terms that come out of these things at all...but yeah, I am definitely no expert!
no subject
Date: 2008-11-09 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-11 12:24 pm (UTC)which is, through its own convoluted lineage, in the context of Sein und Zeit, exactly what you seem to be asking about. I believe you crave a compound word, though, with which I cannot help you.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-12 08:49 pm (UTC)yes, that is what I kind of want to get at, but it seems like Hegel put a more ontological spin on it, whereas I want a more phenomenological flavor. Don't you know enough German or at least enough about German to make compound words?