lapsedmodernist: (Default)
I saw "The Dark Knight," and it was really dark and really good, and Heath Ledger was as amazing on-screen as every review says he is, and then I just laughed non-stop for five minutes, after reading this WSJ op-ed from the wacky reality of Andrew Klavan :

A cry for help goes out from a city beleaguered by violence and fear: A beam of light flashed into the night sky, the dark symbol of a bat projected onto the surface of the racing clouds . . .

Oh, wait a minute. That's not a bat, actually. In fact, when you trace the outline with your finger, it looks kind of like . . . a "W."

There seems to me no question that the Batman film "The Dark Knight," currently breaking every box office record in history, is at some level a paean of praise to the fortitude and moral courage that has been shown by George W. Bush in this time of terror and war. Like W, Batman is vilified and despised for confronting terrorists in the only terms they understand. Like W, Batman sometimes has to push the boundaries of civil rights to deal with an emergency, certain that he will re-establish those boundaries when the emergency is past.

And like W, Batman understands that there is no moral equivalence between a free society -- in which people sometimes make the wrong choices -- and a criminal sect bent on destruction. The former must be cherished even in its moments of folly; the latter must be hounded to the gates of Hell.


This totally made me think of that SNL Celebrity Jeopardy skit, where Matthew Perry as Michael Keaton keeps buzzing in with the only reply "I AM BATMAN." Except with Bush doing that.
lapsedmodernist: (Default)
I have this new favorite game while riding the subway in the morning: The Flash Headline (a variation on the Drive-by Doppler*). I glance over at the Daily News or New York Post or that new freebie, AM New York and try to make sense of the headlines without attempting or even aspiring to read the articles themselves.

It's kind of like a reverse caption contest, where your brain has to visualize (comprehension is a Really Advanced level and proficiency is inversely related to Brains Not Eaten By Zombies) the confounding.

Like this morning, I looked over my right shoulder and saw:

YOU'RE OSAMA! CELEBRITIES' FACES TICKLE IN JUST THE RIGHT WAY

With some kind of pseudo-Biblical symmetry I looked over my left shoulder and beheld:

HALLIBURTON WINS BID TO REBUILD MIDWEST

[in its own image, presumably]

(complete with some low-rez vaguely "depressing" photograph that looks like a Kevin Costner experiment with "post-apocalyptic" photography in Iowa, natch)

This pretty much sums up my only sustainable m.o. of Media Ingestion. Or Media Indigestion (=Indignant Digestion). I know it's Bad For Me, but I like Playing With Fire. I mean, day in and day out I flash my gray matter, I am a total cocktease for the zombies. At the very least, I would have made a naughty, playful Persius, sneaking glanses at the Medusa that were barely in the mirror, like we're talking very low angles of incidence.

It's all fun and games, though, until like a Gowanus Canal Scuba Diver (Gowanus..." "the only body of water in the world...that is 90 percent guns." TM Jonathan "Hipster" Lethem), I have to submerge into the CNNasty.

Fuck you, CNN, because Miles O'Brien looks like Mel Gibson.

I think Mel Gibson should be the new anchor for CNN. I think that kind of lateral promotion would contribute to The Noumenon of CNN and Reality As It Is.

Anyway, so I am working as an archival person/post-production peon for this project and in the course of looking for Gulf War footage, I watched an old CNN special, from before Bush War II (totally cribbing the term from Conversation with Woody Harrelson and Howard Zinn). The tape was called:

CNN PRESENTS: 5 QUESTIONS

Narrated by Lupen Blitzkrieg, of course.

Homo homini wolf blitzer est.

so, the five key questions were:

1. SHOULD SADDAM BE ASSASINATED?
2. DOES SADDAM HAVE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS AND, IF HE DOES, ARE THE US SOLDERS PREPARED?
3. WHAT IF IRAQ STRIKES ISRAEL...AND ISRAEL STRIKES BACK?
4. ARE THE SMART BOMBS REALLY SMARTER?
5. WHAT ABOUT YOUR WALLET?


I shit you not. This was the five-part breakdown.

if were were in a courtroom drama, a hatchet-faced honest attorney would say firmly: "objection, your honor, leading quesitons!" And the judge would Point-Counterpoint with: "and Wolf Blitzer shall dwell with the lamb and a child fetus shall lead them!"

So, like, actually what I learned is, the media doesn't just, like, do a by-the-numbers Orwellian switcheroo on the facts. Its evilocity lies in creating an entire simulacrum of a critical discourse, it is "doing" the American public like those guys "do" the deaf girl in "In the Company of Men." Look at the questions! They address "accountability," "global reprocussions," "ethix," "hyperbole in advertisement" and "the economy." You'd almost think they have a whole analysis of the sociopolitical phenomenon of the military-industrual complex in the post-Cold War milieu of late-stage capitalism! Except that instead of a cause-and-effect discourse you are served a heap of American's Favorite Game, "izzit or aintit?"--a game into which Americans are socialized daily through such playdates with the media as the Michael Jackson Trial and Abortion Vs Terri Schiavo Debate.

When I was little my friends and I liked to play "the knife game." There was no real name for it, it was just "the knife game." We would draw a circle in the ground with the knife and then take turns throwing it into the circle. You would draw a chord going through the point of impact at the angle that the knife entered the ground. That was "your" territory. After the initial split of the circle into two sections, you threw the knife into "enemy" territory, trying to literally "cut off" a large portion for yourself. The trick to the whole thing was, you had to stand on "your territory" while throwing the knife, so if your opponent was doing really well, you could have virtually no ground to stand on, literally. Then you lost.

Because on some level I AM a PSA for "Never Engage With Zombies!" and my brain HAS been compromised, that is what it generates when I send a request for "metaphor."

I went to see my advisor yesterday, and among other things we talked about NPR. He was lamenting the fact that NPR was being sliced and diced out of its remaining pathetic piece of land after being gradually eroded out of whatever "progressive" niche it used to occupy. and how tragic it was.

No way, I said. NPR is kinda like Pastor Niemöller. NPR kept quiet and now that they've come for NPR, there is no one left to speak up for it.

I am going to digitize my sentience and go live on this website. In case the Internet gets unplugged, do not consider me a communist.

*That's when you judge a conversation based on the fragment that you overhear as the interlocutors pass by you. Sometimes this leads to weltschmertz and other times it leads to Overheard in New York
lapsedmodernist: (Default)
I can't believe I didn't know about this. This is someone I know and respect. This is someone I don't just know from conferences as is the case with most academics I intellectually admire. This is someone I know from political work. This is someone who broke it down for you when a preemptive criminalization of dissent was manufactured and amplified by The Media You Trust last summer. This is someone I interviewed and videotaped for the A31 Civil Disobedience piece during the RNC last year. This is the one academic I know who doesn't sit around and wank about the alienation of the ivory tower and the role of intellectuals in public life, but puts his money where his ethics are. This is soemone at the top of the cultural capital pyramid of privilege who lives his life in an ethical way without being a wanker meta-academic who make "theorizing about activism" their schtick. This is someone that I feel lucky and proud to be on the same AAA panel with this year. This is someone who, years ago penned an article that is still my go-to piece when I try to explain to people how "Buffy" really was the most subversive, anti-authoritarian and ethical-in-a-necessary-way show on television. This is someone I wanted to go and study with at Yale back in the day.

And now he is being dismissed from Yale. Which is not unexpected, I sort of wondered periodically how he managed to stay there for as long as he has. But it's yet another nail, and a particularly personal one at that, in the coffin of the once-hopeful idea of universities as fiat lux communities of public discourse and critical thought, one of the few cautiously constructive beams in Marcuse's grim, paralzying One-Dimensional Man model back in the 1960s. Ward Churcill, David Massad, Daniel Pipes' brainchild Campuswatch. I am lucky, my department is "left," but even so over the last couple of years, I have received "gentle"/veiled, but unmistakable in nuance comments from well-meaning academics about thinking through "choices" about who I choose to publically affiliate myself with.

David Graeber is right on: "If you'd asked me six months ago, I would have probably said "academics can be activists as long as they do nothing to challenge the structure of the university," or anyone's power within it. If you want to make an issue of labor conditions in Soweto, great, you're a wonderful humanitarian; if you want to make an issue of labor conditions for the janitors who clean your office, that's an entirely different story. But I think you're right, something's changing. I mean, I'm sure it's not like there's someone giving orders from above or anything, but there's a climate suddenly where people feel they can get away with this sort of thing, and the Ward Churchill and Massad cases obviously must have something to do with that. I've been hearing a lot of stories, in recent weeks, about radical teachers suddenly being let go for no apparent reason. They don't even have to dig up something offensive you're supposed to have said any more - at least, in my case no one is even suggesting I did or said anything outrageous, in which case, at least there'd be something to argue about. If I had to get analytical about it, maybe I'd put it this way. We're moving from the neoliberal university to the imperial university."

Please take a moment and sign the petition in his support. This IS someone you want to be teaching your peers/your kids.

Profile

lapsedmodernist: (Default)
lapsedmodernist

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910111213 1415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 01:10 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios