(no subject)
Jun. 30th, 2005 12:08 pmSome wonder whether Iraq is a central front in the war on terror. Among the terrorists, there is no debate. Hear the words of Osama Bin Laden: "This Third World War is raging" in Iraq. "The whole world is watching this war." He says it will end in "victory and glory, or misery and humiliation."--said Our Leader.
A Republican congressman from North Carolina told CNN on Wednesday that the "evidence is clear" that Iraq was involved in the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001.
Also the fact that this is in the news again fits into my theory of The North Korean Time Lag as unit of measurement.
Also, my morning routine, in addition to coffee, now includes cognitive grumpiness and balancing act, stemming from my semiotic ennui and linguistic aphasia, nee my ironiagnosia (born as in splitting my fucking head open, Athena-style), which, in turn, stem from the fact that language has imploded. Reality has cannibalized the lag, the lacunae that produced irony or hyperbole. Referents that were inscribed in that equation have become outdated.
But, here's what I think: we need new hyperboles. "Orwellian" has stopped being a hyperbole, now it's just true and yesterday's news. It is an impotent word now, standing shyly in the corner, covering its flaccid manhood. But are we so weak? Are we so entrenched in the iconic cultural referents of modernism that we, as a generation, with a cultural moment of our very own clearly demarcated on the calendar as if served on a silver platter, can't come up with one good fucking hyperbole? Are the pomo-haters right, has EVERYTHING been invented already, and we are just pawns, grinning idiotically through a semiotic Gotterdamerung?
People! In our signifying practices we are no better than the ostriches that hide their head in the sand at the prospect of Peak Oil. It's coming, it is quite possibly already here, and if we are going to critique the industrial sector for not getting with the fucking program and preparing to switch the infrastructure over to alternatuve sources of energy instead of proceeding with the apocalyptic endgame of diminishing returns going on now, we should be able to do the same with language. We have hit the Peak Oil of Dystopian Metaphores. You are not going to impress anyone with "orwellian" or "brave new world" or "handmaid's tale" anymore. Furthermore, you are not even going to be able to emphasize. You will think you are emphasizing, but you will be producing verisimilitude, describing reality as is. You will think you are new wave, but, alas, you are verite. So sad.
So everyone, come up with one good hyperbole for our zeitgeist, to fight our ineffectual army of zombie hyperboles that we have been left with.
Let yourself be inspired by Dr. Frankestein, God, Saussure, Lewis Carroll, or Mr. Malaprop.
Start...NOW!
A Republican congressman from North Carolina told CNN on Wednesday that the "evidence is clear" that Iraq was involved in the terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001.
Also the fact that this is in the news again fits into my theory of The North Korean Time Lag as unit of measurement.
Also, my morning routine, in addition to coffee, now includes cognitive grumpiness and balancing act, stemming from my semiotic ennui and linguistic aphasia, nee my ironiagnosia (born as in splitting my fucking head open, Athena-style), which, in turn, stem from the fact that language has imploded. Reality has cannibalized the lag, the lacunae that produced irony or hyperbole. Referents that were inscribed in that equation have become outdated.
But, here's what I think: we need new hyperboles. "Orwellian" has stopped being a hyperbole, now it's just true and yesterday's news. It is an impotent word now, standing shyly in the corner, covering its flaccid manhood. But are we so weak? Are we so entrenched in the iconic cultural referents of modernism that we, as a generation, with a cultural moment of our very own clearly demarcated on the calendar as if served on a silver platter, can't come up with one good fucking hyperbole? Are the pomo-haters right, has EVERYTHING been invented already, and we are just pawns, grinning idiotically through a semiotic Gotterdamerung?
People! In our signifying practices we are no better than the ostriches that hide their head in the sand at the prospect of Peak Oil. It's coming, it is quite possibly already here, and if we are going to critique the industrial sector for not getting with the fucking program and preparing to switch the infrastructure over to alternatuve sources of energy instead of proceeding with the apocalyptic endgame of diminishing returns going on now, we should be able to do the same with language. We have hit the Peak Oil of Dystopian Metaphores. You are not going to impress anyone with "orwellian" or "brave new world" or "handmaid's tale" anymore. Furthermore, you are not even going to be able to emphasize. You will think you are emphasizing, but you will be producing verisimilitude, describing reality as is. You will think you are new wave, but, alas, you are verite. So sad.
So everyone, come up with one good hyperbole for our zeitgeist, to fight our ineffectual army of zombie hyperboles that we have been left with.
Let yourself be inspired by Dr. Frankestein, God, Saussure, Lewis Carroll, or Mr. Malaprop.
Start...NOW!
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 04:18 pm (UTC)Is that you giving the finger?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 04:30 pm (UTC)And
Is that you giving the finger?
Why, yes, it is!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 04:33 pm (UTC)Let me get this straight: what you're saying is that you want us to come up with an adjective describing the political and economic state of our world in general, America in particular? And you want us to draw on the annals of literature and philosophy for inspiration?
I was actually kinda digging gotterdamerung, mabye switching it up to gotterdamerwhatever because the 'whatever' is what got us here in the first place, but I think the more appropriate term would just be FUCKTARDED.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 04:45 pm (UTC)is "fucktarded" hyperbole? Discuss. I will consider the neologistic possibilities of gotterdamerung.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:why settle for the lesser evil?
Date: 2005-06-30 05:21 pm (UTC)it's hitlerrific!
Re: why settle for the lesser evil?
Date: 2005-06-30 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 05:38 pm (UTC)How about "Ragnarocious"?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 05:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 05:49 pm (UTC)Hmm...Quadruple-plus ungood? Schreber-esque oppression? "Dang, I feel like I'm living in a KMFDM video"?
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 07:39 pm (UTC)I like that!
(no subject)
From:semiotic goetterdaemerung
Date: 2005-06-30 05:49 pm (UTC)as for contemporary zeitgeistliche hyperboles.. at times even a brief walk through midtown is usually enough to start me wondering if 'revelations' was more than just religious frippery... on better days i try to limit the cliched scope of such visions of pending doom... but you do recall the myth of atlantis
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 05:56 pm (UTC)That must mean I'm employed by every company I ever sent a résumé, or that tried to recruit me. Genius.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 07:41 pm (UTC)I don't think resumes were even reviewed...
(no subject)
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
Date: 2005-06-30 06:13 pm (UTC)Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:Re: Götterdämmerung
From:no subject
Date: 2005-07-01 03:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 06:34 pm (UTC)the Seattle Times headline yesterday: Bush on Iraq War: Don't forget 9/11.
To me, this is like saying "Picasso on lunchtime: don't forget the Dark Ages!" in its seeming irrelevance among all three points.
Humpty-Dumpsterism? Seems too old; it's like something Mark Twain would write about. I'll keep thinking.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 07:51 pm (UTC)that is AWESOME!!!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 06:54 pm (UTC)Fuck Dr. Frankestein, God, Saussure, Lewis Carroll, or Mr. Malaprop--think Laverne and Shirley.
no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 06:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-06-30 08:54 pm (UTC)Because my state is exactly this as well, there will be no hyperbole on my part. But man, that paragraph above, is one of the most stimulating sentences I have read in a while. Thanks !
the death of hyperbole
Date: 2005-06-30 09:35 pm (UTC)or perhaps it is only hyperbole to say so..
well let them eat cake i suppose
on a personal note, I'm lovin' it.
Date: 2005-07-01 03:17 am (UTC)"She obviously hates your freedom."
"In this post 9-11 environment, it's hard to find a decent haircut."
"that's pretty Fox-News."
or
"I'm in the last throes of my morning cereal. Let me call you back."
ps: I'm sorry that you missed the highest calling.
no subject
Date: 2005-07-01 07:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-01 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-07-01 07:29 pm (UTC)http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050630/sc_nm/environment_oceans_dc;_ylt=AudRDJTVy7k_cB9vvKrLoqAhANEA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
(no subject)
From: