Oct. 26th, 2004

lapsedmodernist: (Default)
Food

Every day (except Sunday) I find a place with an Almuerzo menu to my liking. The lunch usually costs between $1.20 and $1.60 and includes soup (usually my favorite Timbushca, which sounds quaintly Russian and is basically potato-and-cabbage stew), a main course (usually some variation on chicken or fish with rice. Often it's corvina fish, which I've never tried before, and it is my new favorite fish, it tastes like turkey, but better) and desert (either wonderful fruit salad, or nasty fruit jello). And fruit juice, which I usually sub for a soda if I am not sure of the water quality in the place.

It took me about a week to get over the fear of eating street food, but now I am all about it. The best is mote con chicharron, which is, like, corn that's sort of like popcorn, but if it was soaked in water before being cooked, with deep-deep friend pieces of pork, with some hot sauce served in a little plastic bag. You eat it in the go with a spoon.

Ceviche is like sushi, when it's good it's really good, when it's not so good it's really disgusting, that's probably a universal rule of raw seafood. Mixed ceviche from camaron (shrimp) y concha (which I am a little unclear about what it is, I think it's like octopus) is the best.

I have been eating much, much more sugar than I usually do. In New York I barely eat any sugar (probably because I get it all in the form of glucose, from the 2 lbs of grapes I eat daily): I take my coffee with milk only, I virtually never eat candy or sweets, and I drink either water or non-sweetened fruit juices. But again, I think it's the altitude, I have gotten over most of the other altitide glitches, but I am still easily exhausted, and I don't think it's going away. Coffee does not quite do the trick by itself, but sugar does, so I've been drinking a lot of Coke (which I haven't touched in years), and eating fruit salad with yoghurt and ample, ample honey every day.


Sleep

I am on, like, a radically different schedule from my normal one. I go to sleep around 10 PM and wake up, without an alarm clock, at about 7.30 in the morning. The last time I even approximated anything close to that was when I was working at an archaeological dig in Israel and we had to be up at 4.30 in the morning and in the field by 5 AM in order to return to the base by 1 PM when the sun became intolerable. But as anyone who knows me, when not forced by circumstances, my natural circadian rhythm puts me to bed somewhere around 3 AM. The current schedule is due to the fact that I rarely go out after dark (except an occasional glimpse at US news in the expat pub across the street), and I am usually done with all of my daytime stuff by about 5 PM. I sleep very heavily without my usual insomnia, which I also attribute to mountain air.

It is freaking cold at nights (and yesterday I spotted snow on the Pichincha volcano, which meant it was extra-cold last night) and there is no heat, so I sleep with two wool blankets and a hot water bottle. I have become a connoisseur of hot water bottles. Too-thin plastic will be uncomfortable and will lose heat faster than thicker plastic, which will warm you gentler and for longer. It storms a lot, and since Quito is so high up, thunder is particularly loud. Showers in the morning have to be quick because warm water can be cajoled out of the shower for anywhere between a minute and a half and two minutes at a time. There is also inverse relationship between water heat and water pressure, i.e. to get the warm water, albeit briefly, you have to turn the shower on halfway, then slowly turn it off until a hot trickle remains. Then it turns cold.

Transportation

Quito has a really well-developed public transport infrastructure. There are busses, trolley busses and ecobusses. Also there are fleets and fleets of dilapidated cabs. Which brings me to a question, and it's not hypothetical, so if anyone knows a statistically substantiated answer, please share, because this is something I have to entertain at least every couple of days:
In case of a car accident, am I more likely to die in a front seat with a seatbelt, or a backseat without a seatbelt? It should be noted that 75% of cabs don't have functioning seatbelts at all, which does not bother anyone except for me. It also does not bother anyone except for me that 50% of the time a red light is interpreted as a challenge to increase speed, rather than an invitation to brake.

Books

As other travellers know, when you are nomadic, you read whatever is around--books left around by previous tenants, the random assortment of book exchanges, etc. While I am reading an Ecuadorian book about Galapagos in the 1950s in Spanish, I have also breezed through some readily-available English-language literature, including:

Jim Lehrer's The Last Debate. Did y'all know he wrote novels? Because I didn't. Anyway, even though the narrative voice is a bit...peculiar the book itself is pretty interesting. Basically, there are four journalists who are picked to moderate/host the only presidential debate between a well-meaning, but totally undynamic and uncharismatic-type liberal (think Lieberman but well-meaning) and a totally crazy fucking racist fundie who's got charisma. The journalists agree that the win for the fundie would be a catastraphe for the US, and, as they come into possession of some incriminating info about him hours before the debate they make a decision to dispense with the rules and throw it, ensuring the liberal's victory. It's half-suspense story, half-meditation of journalistic ethics in the corporate day and age. If you need something to be distracting but not escapist in the next few days, this book is your friend.

The first two Left Behind books, which, while totally insane, are addictive like crack. I am sad there aren't more around. I want to see what happens now that the Antichrist has been installed into the UN and has moved the UN to New Babylon. Has anyone on my friends list actually read them? Because now I really want to discuss them. Like, were you as shocked as I was when it turned out Buck was a virgin? Is there implicit criticism of corporate media ownership as it exists today? Are Jews: Revelations = Eliza Doolitle: Pygmalion? There are so many questions.

I have more to say, but it's almuerzo time.

Also I had an interview today, and it looks like after I get back here from San Francisco, I will be off to the Jatun Sacha biostation in the Upper Amazon rainforest for a month. Christmas and New Year's bonding with the local flora and fauna. Woot.
lapsedmodernist: (Default)
Ok, as I just mentioned, I read the first two Left Behind books. I found them completely fascinating from an anthropological perspective. A few of you responded saying that you've been interested in checking them out. So here is an idea. I think I learned a lot from them, especially when read in context of Ron Suskind's "Without a Doubt"* article in New York Times magazine that ran last week. I want to discuss them. Who on my friends list wants to read the first book in the next, say, week, and then have a discussion about it on my journal? I know it looks big, but there is margin-and-font padding, and it's easily readable in a day, two days max. If you are interested, sign up in the reply section.

* My favorite part of the article was, like, the dialogue between Neo and Agent Smith:

I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.

The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors...and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."
lapsedmodernist: (Default)
Did y'all get my postcards? So far I know that [livejournal.com profile] twotoedsloth, [livejournal.com profile] saintpeg and [livejournal.com profile] spawnsong got theirs. As did anthromama and anthropapa. And also Advisor/Chair. What about the rest?

p.s. I sent one to everyone who gave me their addresses and indicated that they wished to receive one. So if you didn't get one, it's either the fault of the postal service, or your fault.
lapsedmodernist: (Default)
God, if there is another twist in the AAA story I will wake up a cockroach (yes, [livejournal.com profile] trochee, this is a shout-out to you).

First it was in SF. Then it was going to be in San Jose. Then it got moved to Atlanta. Then it got bifurcated into the Renegade AAA at Berkeley and official AAA in Atlanta, dividing panel member against panel member, much like the civil war peeps be prophesizing for Early November. Then, after we were told to change our plans, we were told to not change out plans after all, because we might go back to SF if Beloved Mayor negociates a 3-month "cool-off" period. Beloved Mayor fails to negociate a 3-month cool-off period, joins the picket line. Presumably we are back to Atlanta. Short-lived elation over the possibility of returning to SF is over. But it's still not 100% certain. Stay tuned for further updates from the AAA and the bifurcated panels.

In other good news, Bush wants to do away with the Hague (tribunal, not city, although probably city too, for good measure). This actually might be good news, because the first motivation that comes to mind is that in case he fails to steal the election, he doesn't wanna be tried there.

Also, for those of you familiar with whitehouse.org, a fake shrewd Onion-style website that mimics the real thing, they just published a bunch of letters from the people who contact them thinking they are the real deal.

Here are a few of my favorites, proving that not a) sarcasm is not a concept that registers on the radar for many, but b)even so, it may be useful, since some angry readers are planning to withdraw their votes from Bush now.

SUBJECT = Gift shop
NAME = Robert Malcolm
MESSAGE = I have just visited the gift shop by using the link provided by this web site. The Items that are offered are very offensive. I am a christian veiwing a so called christian presidents web site. To find these kind of sloagans really have me concerned. I do not care if this is approved or not! This is not the kind of materiall that is expected to found on a presidential wed site. Expecially a Christians mans site.


see? This next one is pretty sweet

SUBJECT = ads
NAME = joan langley
MESSAGE = I have just viewed the ad approved by President Bush, "False Christian", referring to John Kerry's faith. I AM APPALLED BY THIS AD. I am a Christian and know my savior, Jesus Christ (a Jew) also was a descendant of Jews.

This ad is an insult to all Jews and Christians. I am ashamed that it would be on your Web site. I have almost always voted Republician but if this name calling if how you win votes, I would be ashamed to vote Republician


and in the same vein:

SUBJECT = Horrified
NAME = Benjamin Bar
MESSAGE = I am appaled and horrified by your newly released video clip about John Kerry's grand father background, it reminds me of Nazis speaking, especially prononciating the word "Jew" the way this narrator does, and besides, what is wrong for someone to convert to Christianity? how many Christians convert to Judaism? This is disgusting and appaling, and to top it off, President Bush approves this message, well Mr Bush, I was a fan of yours, but unfortunately you have just lost three votes, because this is just not right.


And then the "helpful" emails

SUBJECT = False Christian
NAME = Jo Chalcraft
MESSAGE = I am a very strong Bush supporter and I visit the website quit often. I just saw the TV Ad "False Christian", I'm sorry to say I'm very disappointed you would produce such a thing as well as being very disappointed that President Bush would approve it. I've watch on-line all the ads that have been available and like all of them but this one. Some better then others but this one cause a very uncomfortable knot in my stomach. As a Christian I can't help but wonder if Jews won't see it as anti-Semitic. I too wonder why Kerry has tried to hide is heredity as well as having serious doubts about him really being a sincere Christian but I'm sure you can find a better way to get this across. I seriously hope you will decide not to show this ad.


Oh yeah, and you can see the "False Christian" ad, which is pretty awesome, if you go here

Profile

lapsedmodernist: (Default)
lapsedmodernist

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910111213 1415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 25th, 2026 05:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios