On a meme roll
Sep. 23rd, 2004 02:41 amI just realized something: my favorite getting-to-know people question would make an excellent meme. So here it is, answer, ask others if you want, I find it very informative, and in all the years I've been asking it, I've never gotten the same answer twice.
Come up with a metaphor or simile that most accrately describes how your mind works.
Come up with a metaphor or simile that most accrately describes how your mind works.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:03 am (UTC)can you elaborate?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:15 am (UTC)Things are all over the place, but there's a surprising amount of stuff in there that you would never imagine actually all fits. And if you ask the right question, the rummage-master will come back with a useful little widget that you never knew even existed. I often have that moment of "where did I ever learn that odd little piece of trivia?"
Also, it's like a rummage closet in that most of the stuff in there isn't useful.
I'm going to think about this again tomorrow and see if I have a different answer.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:39 am (UTC)But, FOR YOU, My Mind is... an abacus that fell down a well and grew gills and fins.
This thing would work much better if you said "give me 3 metaphors", because then the metaphors can fight. And if the people choose similes that are active (like: cat, dog, mouse) then you'd have yourself a real fight which could be like a meta-metaphor. Metaphors are boooring by themselves, but contradictory metaphors can lead to some kind of insight.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 04:48 am (UTC)Or a showtune sung by Tom Waits...
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 06:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 06:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 08:09 am (UTC)Or sometimes it's a monkey, just like everyone else's mind I suppose.
What about you? How do you answer the question?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:21 pm (UTC)most but not all related more or less to what's local.
my answer to this question is usally: my mind is like an infinite connect-the-dots game that never stops, all dots can always be connected to other dots in infinite permutations and combinations, and thus no piece of inforation is ever useless, it mst be stored away until another piece of information it can be connected to will emerge.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 08:23 am (UTC)or
Sort of like a cross between a sloth and and a terrier puppy, except with a slightly depressive component.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 09:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 09:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:38 pm (UTC)but of course. I really like it.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 09:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 01:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 10:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 10:35 am (UTC)i don't know. i've seriously never really thought about how my mind works -- who i am, etc. for sure, but the mechanics of my thought processes...i feel more defined by the kind of work my mind does (i.e. what i tend to think about, the various filters that i put on the world around me) than how it works. all i could come up with is, for better or worse: linear, all at once, and building upon itself (i.e. taking itself as it's own subject in addition to the subject at hand), yet often to no real end. the fact that i had to use a mechanical (electrical, whatever) metaphor is extremely disappointing to me, yet somehow makes the circuitry metaphor more appropriate.
what's your metaphor?
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 04:37 pm (UTC)it was interesting to see the variety of responses to this -- i feel like the type of metaphor chosen (computational process, comparison to another human, comparison to a natural phenomena) is probably more telling than the actual metaphor itself. there was an article in the new yorker a few weeks ago discussing the inadequacies of the myers-briggs test -- how it doesn't allow for gray area (i.e. you are either I or E), but also how those four categories are really so arbitratry and can hardly describe the entirety of someone's personality. anyway, i feel like this question might be a good supplemental question, or could provide the basis for an alternate (supplemental) method of assessment. it really tells you a lot i think.
no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 11:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-23 08:59 pm (UTC)or maybe it's the other way around...