As if there weren't enough
Nov. 12th, 2006 05:44 pmOne more reason to hate Lieberman
What a shameless whore.
Democrats who voted for him are going to regret this when he starts caucusing with Republicans.
Behold the video of him grinning to Russert about how he's got Democrats over a barrel.
What a shameless whore.
Democrats who voted for him are going to regret this when he starts caucusing with Republicans.
Behold the video of him grinning to Russert about how he's got Democrats over a barrel.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-12 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-12 10:57 pm (UTC)And I can totally see him crossing the floor, depending on which way he thinks the wind will be blowing in 2008. He will certainly continue to vote with the Republicans on key issues, as he has already been doing, which led to his disenfrenchisement from the party in the first place.
He is not as batshit crazy as Zell Miller, but is equally morally reprehensible.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-12 11:03 pm (UTC)I don't really like the guy, but I totally get where he's coming from.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-12 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-12 11:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 12:30 am (UTC)I kind of agree with jacflash-- the dems were willing to stand behind others who swayed from the platform (e.g. pro-life Bob Casey) if they calculated a win. Here Clinton et al took a risk and bet wrong. I wouldn't have a whole lot of loyalty either.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 01:31 am (UTC)If nothing else, Miller's (apparently) acting out of principle, as repugnant as those principles are. If, as you say, the wind blows to the left by '08, I imagine we'll see Lieberman toe the line, whereas that wouldn't be the case with Miller (were he still in office).
...And boo to Feingold opting out. :(
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 04:50 am (UTC)Um, Lamont had some issues, too.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 05:06 am (UTC)I had no trouble at all with Lieberman running as an independent, and was against the outrage at him for doing so. That's democracy, especially since he wasn't a spoiler (like Nader) -- he won. But I do not like the guy, not one little bit, and I think what he's doing now is typical.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 06:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-11-13 09:39 am (UTC)Anyhow, with a Senate that evenly split and a Republican president, I wouldn't count on anything that positive happening regardless.
hey there
Date: 2006-11-17 04:18 am (UTC)i totally agree with you about lieberman, though frankly, we'll take his "independent" vote, even if he's been pro-war, like almost all of the other republican lites that call themselves democrats. . . maybe now, because it's politically expedient and safe now, the dem's will have some fucking backbone.
miss you nika.
peace and love,
--j2b
Re: hey there
Date: 2006-11-18 01:05 am (UTC)added and also you still owe me a Real Email!
I am in California at a conference at the moment, but once I am ensconced back in my study, I will look-see what you have done with your new blue cyber-world...