Nov. 3rd, 2008

lapsedmodernist: (Default)
Greg Palast, one of the few remaining investigative journalists has been investigating voter fraud for years. And his 2004 scenario came to pass. Let's just hope that tomorrow the margin is so large that even all of this won't be enough.

Monday 03 November 2008

by: Greg Palast, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

It's November 5 and the nation is in shock. Media blame it on the "Bradley effect": Americans supposedly turned into Klansmen inside the voting booth, and Barack Obama turned up with 6 million votes less than calculated from the exit polls. Florida came in for McCain and so did Indiana. Colorado, despite the Democrats' Rocky Mountain high after the Denver convention, stayed surprisingly Red. New Mexico, a state where Anglos are a minority, went McCain by 300 votes, as did Virginia.

That's the nightmare. Here's the cold reality.

Swing state Colorado. Before this election, two Republican secretaries of state purged 19.4 percent of the entire voter roll. One in five voters. Pfft!

Swing state New Mexico. One in nine voters in this year's Democratic caucus found their names missing from the state-provided voter registries. And not just any voters. County by county, the number of voters disappeared was in direct proportion to the nonwhite population. Gore won the state by 366 votes; Kerry lost it by only 5,900. Despite reassurances that all has been fixed for Tuesday, Democrats lost from the list in February told me they're still "disappeared" from the lists this week.

Swing state Indiana. In this year's primary, ten nuns were turned away from the polls because of the state's new voter ID law. They had drivers' licenses, but being in their 80s and 90s, they'd let their licenses expire. Cute. But what isn't cute is this: 566,000 registered voters in that state don't have the ID required to vote. Most are racial minorities, the very elderly and first-time voters; that is, Obama voters. Twenty-three other states have new, vote-snatching ID requirements.

Swing state Florida. Despite a lawsuit battle waged by the Brennan Center for Justice, the state's Republican apparatchiks are attempting to block the votes of 85,000 new registrants, forcing them to pass through a new "verification" process. Funny thing: verification applies only to those who signed up in voter drives (mostly black), but not to voters registering at motor vehicle offices (mostly white).

And so on through swing states controlled by Republican secretaries of state.

The Ugly Secret

Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.

This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.

That's what I found while traveling the nation over the last year for BBC Television and Rolling Stone Magazine, working with voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This we guarantee: there will be far more votes disappeared by Tuesday night than the three million lost in 2004. A six-million vote swipe, quite likely, shifts 4 percent of the ballots, within the margin of error of the tightest polls.

Begin with this harsh statistic: since the last election, more than ten million voters have been purged from the nation's vote registries. And that's just the start of the steal.

If the noncount were random, it wouldn't matter. But it's not random. A US Civil Rights Commission analysis shows that the chance a black voter's ballot will "spoil" or be blank is 900 percent higher than a white voter's.

Does that mean the election's stolen and you should forget voting and just go back to bed for four years? Hell, no. It means you vote and vote smart, learn how to pry their filthy little hands off your ballot (there's a link at the end).

read the rest here:

www.truthout.org/110308A
lapsedmodernist: (Default)
This may be small, this may be petty, but I want to tell you:

In the last 8 years, not once, not a single time did I refer to that monstrosity in the White House as "President Bush." This is including conference papers, teaching, and professional correspondence which consisted of me requesting various archival footage of media appearances of him. For the first year I bitterly said "Governor Bush" (and President Gore), from then on I used "Bush, Jr." when I had to signify him specifically. People thought it was weird, and childish, even my friends who fucking hate George Bush as much as I do made fun of me.

not. a. single. time. Not even in my dreams/nightmares.

And small as that is, I am proud of it and it makes me happy. It's like on the level of language (and oh, how powerful language is) I never let myself be hailed (in the Althusserian sense of the word) into this HEGEMONY, because this is what the last 8 years was. And the hegemony, like any good hegemony, even encompassed the dissent--"I think Bush is a terrible president" or "I don't agree with President Bush on foreign policy"--but that's legitimation, too, it's using language prescribed by winners hijackers of History or thiefs of Presidential elections. I don't know--for me it was so important to always maintain some kind of resistance, if only discursive, to the hegemony of the BushMatrix reality. If my semiotics were all I had, at least I had that, the whole time.


He was never my president. He wasn't yours, either.

Profile

lapsedmodernist: (Default)
lapsedmodernist

February 2014

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910111213 1415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 24th, 2026 06:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios